|
By
Afghanland.com: The
third major policy focus of the immediate post-World War II period
was Shah Mahmud's experiment in greater political tolerance and
liberalization. Encouraged by young, Western-educated members of
the political elite, the prime minister allowed National Assembly
elections that were distinctly less controlled than they had been
in the past; the result was the "liberal parliament" of
1949. He tolerated the activity of opposition political groups.
The most vocal of these groups was the Wikh-i-Zalmayan (Awakened
Youth), a movement comprised of diverse dissident groups founded
in Qandahar in 1947. A newly formed student union not only
provided a forum for political debate but also produced theatrical
plays critical of Islam and the monarchy. Newspapers criticized
the government, and many groups began demanding a more open
political system.
But the liberalization went farther
than the prime minister had intended. He reacted by attempting to
form a government party, and when this failed, he began cracking
down. The
Kabul
University student union was dissolved in 1951; newspapers
criticizing the government were closed down; many opposition
leaders were jailed. The parliament that was elected in 1952 was a
significant step backward from the one that had been elected in
1949. The brief experiment in open politics was over.
According to Afghanland.com
sources, During Zahir Shah's term, the
liberal experiment had important repercussions for the nation's
political future: it provided a breeding ground for the
revolutionary movement that would come to power in 1978. Future
Marxist leaders of Afghanistan, Nur Muhammad Taraki, Babrak Karmal,
and Hafizullah Amin were all involved. The government crackdown in
1951 and 1952 that brought an abrupt end to liberalization
alienated many young, reformist Afghans who had originally hoped
only to improve the existing structure rather than radically
transforming it.
The new government both represented
and sought change. Within two months, ordered an investigation
into the abysmal conditions of Afghan prisons, and reached an
agreement reestablishing diplomatic and trade relations with
Pakistan.
The single greatest achievement of
the 1963-73 decade was the promulgation of the 1964 constitution.
A mere two weeks after Daoud's resignation, the king appointed a
commission to draft
a new constitution. In the spring of 1964, he ordered the
convening of a loya jirga a country-wide gathering that included
members of the National Assembly, the Senate, the Supreme Court,
and the constitutional commission. One hundred and seventy-six
members were elected by the provinces and thirty-four members were
appointed directly by the king. Although the assemblage of 452
persons (including six women) that met in September 1964 was
composed primarily of officials who could be expected to support
the royal line, the loya jirga also included members elected from
around the entire nation. On September 20, the document was signed
by the 452 members and ten days later, the kings signature
transformed it into the new constitution.
The constitution--and the
deliberations that produced it--demonstrated several noteworthy
changes in political thinking. It barred the royal family, other
than the king, from participating in politics and government--a
provision that was perceived as keeping Daoud out of politics.
Individual rights were strongly championed by provincial delegates
over tribal ones. Conservative religious members were persuaded to
accept provisions they once considered intolerably secular.
Although a lengthy debate ensued over whether the word Afghan
should be used to denote all citizens of Afghanistan (many people
regarded it as a reference only to Pashtuns), the loya jirga
agreed that this term should apply to all citizens. The
constitution identified Islam as "the sacred religion of
Afghanistan," but it was still necessary to persuade many
conservative members that their religion had been enshrined in the
constitution. Although Article 64 decreed that no law could be
enacted that was "repugnant to the basic principles" of
Islam, Article 69 defined laws as a resolution passed by the
houses of parliament and signed by the king, with sharia to be
used when no such law existed.
The constitution's provisions for
an independent judiciary, according to afghanland.com, gave rise to heated debate among
religious leaders, many of whom supported the existing legal
system based on religion. Although religious judges were
incorporated into the new judicial system, the supremacy of
secular law was established. The new constitution provided for a
constitutional monarchy, with a bicameral legislature, but
predominant power remained in the hands of the king.
Most observers described the 1965
elections as remarkably fair. The 216-member Wolesi Jirgah, or the
lower house of parliament, included representation not only by
antiroyalists but also by the left and right of the political
spectrum. Included were supporters of the king, Pashtun
nationalists, entrepreneurs and industrialists, political
liberals, a small group of leftists, and conservative Muslim
leaders still opposed to secularization. The king nominated a new prime
minister, Mohammad Hashim Maiwandwal, who quickly established
friendly relations with the students, while making it clear that
he was in charge and there were limits to student political
activity.
On January 1, 1965, the People's
Democratic Party of Afghanistan (PDPA) was founded. The PDPA, a
communist party in fact if not in name, was established for the
primary purpose of gaining parliamentary seats. The PDPA was
comprised of a small group of men, followers of Nur Mohammad
Taraki and Babrak Karmal, both avowed Marxist-Leninists with a
pro-Moscow orientation. The fact that four PDPA members won
parliamentary seats suggests that government efforts to prevent
the success of its leftist opponents by intervening in the
balloting were halfhearted. Taraki, one of the four PDPA members
elected to parliament in 1965, started the first major leftist
newspaper, Khalq (Masses), which lasted little more than a month
before being silenced by a government ban.
The Afghan political system
remained suspended between democracy and monarchy, although it
was, in reality, much closer to the latter. Political parties
continued to be prohibited because the king refused to sign
legislation allowing them. Democracy nevertheless maintained a
toehold in the lower house of parliament where free criticism of
government policies and personnel was aired.
In 1967, only a year and a half
after its founding, the PDPA had split into several factions. The
two most important of these were the Khalq (Masses) faction headed
by Taraki and the Parcham (Banner) faction headed by Karmal.
Although the split was couched in ideological terms, it was
largely due to personality differences between Taraki and Karmal
and to their respective preferences in organizing tactics. Taraki
favored a Leninist-type party based on the working class, while
Karmal wanted a broad democratic front. Supporters of Khalq were
primarily Pashtuns from rural Afghanistan, while Parchamis tended
to be from urban areas, to come from a better socio-economic
background than Khalqis. Unlike the Khalqis, Parchamis included
many non-Pashtuns who spoke Dari (Persian) in their ranks.
The monarchy did not treat both
factions equally. Karmal's Parcham faction was allowed to publish
its own newspaper, Parcham, for more than a year (from March 1968
to July 1969) while the Khalq faction had its paper banned. As a
result, Khalq accused Parcham of having connections with the king
and bitterly denounced its rival as the "Royal Communist
Party."
The 1969 parliamentary elections,
when voter turnout was not much greater than in 1965 produced a
legislative assembly essentially consistent with the real
population and distribution of power in the hinterland, in that
conservative landowners and businessmen predominated and many more
non-Pashtuns were elected than in the previous legislature. Most
of the urban liberals
and all of the female delegates lost their seats. Few leftists
remained in the new parliament, although Karmal and Hafizullah
Amin had been elected from districts in and near Kabul. Former
prime minister Maiwandwal, a democratic socialist, lost his seat
when the government selectively influenced the elections.
Between 1969 and 1973, instability
ruled Afghan politics. The parliament was lethargic and
deadlocked. Public dissatisfaction over the unstable government
prompted growing political polarization as both the left and the
right began to attract more members. Still personally popular, the
king nevertheless came under increasing criticism for not
supporting his own prime ministers.
It was in this atmosphere of
internal discontent and polarization and external shakiness that
Daoud implemented the coup d'état he had been planning for a year
in response to the "anarchy and the anti-national attitude of
the regime." While the king was out of the country for
medical treatment, Daoud and a small military group seized power
in an almost bloodless coup. The stability Zahir Shah had sought
through constitutionally sanctioned limited democracy had not been
achieved, and was a generally favorable response greeted Daoud's
reemergence even though it meant the demise of the monarchy Ahmad
Shah Durrani established in 1747. Afghanland.com all rights
reserved |